US President Donald Trump offers a hand to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a meeting in New York, 25 September 2019

Image copyright
Getty Images

Did President Donald Trump withhold military aid from ally Ukraine for his own political reasons? That is the big question at the heart of the Democrat-led impeachment inquiry.

Ukraine is not in Nato and it has struggled with years of corruption. But its future direction is of geopolitical importance.

Why does Ukraine matter to US?

For much of its 28-year independent history it has been unclear whether Ukraine would end up aligned with Russia or the West.

In 2014, that uncertainty appeared to come to an end. After a bloody street revolution, Ukraine’s new leaders asserted that the country’s future lay with closer association with Europe and the West. Russia was now seen as the enemy and it responded by seizing Crimea and supporting an armed uprising in eastern Ukraine that has so far cost more than 13,000 lives.

Under the US Obama administration, Ukrainians’ right to decide their own future, and to resist Russian aggression, was defended as an important ideological principle.

That changed when President Trump took office, and Ukraine’s government has not been able to rely on America’s active support in the same way since.

How much military aid does the US give?

The US has a longstanding relationship with the Ukrainian military and has committed about $1.5bn (GBP1.2bn; EUR1.4bn) in aid since 2014.

Much of that has been spent training soldiers and in efforts to modernise the dated way the Ukrainian army is organised and operates.

Image copyright
Getty Images

The latest tranche of assistance, which was held up and then released by the Trump administration, is worth $391m and includes a range of weapons and technical assistance.

How important is US military aid and support to Ukraine?

It is important on both a military and symbolic level.

Where once the Ukrainian military knew that the US had their backs, this can no longer be taken for granted.

The wavering over assistance, and President Trump’s frequent derogatory words about Ukraine, will almost certainly have strengthened Moscow’s hand in peace negotiations.

How is Ukraine linked to Trump impeachment inquiry?

The impeachment inquiry touches on the 2016 US presidential election campaign and also President Trump’s possible opponent in 2020 – Joe Biden. Ukraine is involved in both.

So far no Ukrainian has been called to testify. The inquiry is instead focusing on the official and “irregular” US channels of communication between Washington and Kyiv.

Why does the 2016 election keep coming up?

President Trump’s lukewarm attitude towards Ukraine dates back to the election campaign of 2016.

At the time, Mr Trump’s campaign manager – Paul Manafort – was forced to resign after documents emerged in Ukraine that suggested he had received off-the-books payments from a pro-Russian political party.

President Trump and his supporters say that by releasing the documents, Ukrainian officials unfairly interfered to support his Democrat opponent Hillary Clinton.

Despite the best efforts of President Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani, the evidence to support the claims remains extremely thin. Meanwhile, Mr Manafort has been jailed for financial crimes.

What about the Bidens?

This has turned into the central part of the impeachment inquiry with both parties approaching from a different angle.

It concerns a period in 2014-15 when Vice-President Biden was the Obama administration’s point-man on Ukraine. At the same time his son, Hunter, had a lucrative directorship with a Ukrainian gas company.

image

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Democrats are seeking to prove that President Trump leveraged US military assistance and a White House visit in return for Ukraine’s president launching an investigation into the Bidens.

Republicans are trying to make this about the Bidens. They want to know why Hunter was paid so much, and whether the vice-president used his political clout to help his son’s company.

What is the Ukrainian government saying about it?

Ukraine’s initial response through President Volodymyr Zelensky was to say that he had felt “no pressure” from the White House to launch an investigation into the Bidens. It has become part of President Trump’s mantra when he riffs about his “perfect” 25 July phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart.

Since then, testimony and text messages released by US diplomats have made it clear that Ukrainian officials were confused and worried about the hold-up in US assistance. And that they were being told the way out was to announce investigations into both the 2016 election and the Bidens.

We now know, for example, that the Ukrainians were actively considering capitulating and doing a TV interview that would announce the investigations that President Trump clearly wanted.

image

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Mindful of getting further sucked into partisan US politics the Ukrainian officials involved are declining to give their side of the story.

What do Ukrainians think?

For the most part they’ve moved on. Ukrainians are more preoccupied by their new president’s efforts to bring peace in the east than his phone call with Trump.

President Zelensky has recently made a series of concessions in the hope of getting Russia to the negotiating table. His critics are accusing him of naivety and capitulating to President Vladimir Putin.

0 comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Subotić: Rezolucija o integraciji Crne Gore u EU izraz posvećenosti interesima građana
    on 03/03/2026 at 13:39

    Poslanik Kluba poslanika “Evropa sad” Jovan Subotić saopštio je na skupštinskom zasijedanju na Cetinju da Klub poslanika “Evropa sad” doživljava Rezoluciju o integraciji Crne Gore u EU kao izraz posvećenosti interesima građana Crne Gore, kao izraz jasnog opredeljenja da je Evropski put najbolji pravac razvoja i budućnost sa najviše prilika za građane Crne Gore.

  • Počela prva sjednica Prvog redovnog zasijedanja u 2026. godini
    on 03/03/2026 at 12:14

    Prva sjednica Prvog redovnog zasijedanja u 2026. godini počela je na Cetinju.

  • Kos: Vrijeme je da se počne sa razgovorima o ugovoru o pristupanju Crne Gore EU
    on 03/03/2026 at 12:01

    Evropska komesarka za proširenje Marta Kos istakla je za Politico da su pregovori Brisela i Crne Gore o članstvu te zemlje u EU ušli u posljednju godinu i da je ta mala balkanska zemlja prva u redu za ulazak u blok.

  • Bogdanović: Institucije ne treba da pređu preko prijetnji Edina Kolarevića
    on 03/03/2026 at 11:36

    Poslanik Demokratske Crne Gore Boris Bogdanović kazao je da institucije ne treba da pređu preko prijetnji sestrića Aca Đukanovića, Edina Kolarevića i poručio da je vrijeme kada je marica bila simbol straha za građane, a komfora za kriminalce, završeno.

  • Produžava se privremena zaštita građanima Ukrajine
    on 03/03/2026 at 10:09

    Iz Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova saopšteno je da se privremena zaštita građanima Ukrajine u Crnoj Gori produžava do 4. marta 2027. godine. Navedeni datum važi i za one građane Ukrajine koji prvi put podnose Zahtjev za odobrenje privremene zaštite u Crnoj Gori.

  • Đeljošaj i Meken: Jačanje ekonomskog partnerstva i reformskih procesa Crne Gore i Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva
    on 02/03/2026 at 16:55

    Potpredsjednik Vlade za ekonomsku politiku i ministar ekonomskog razvoja, Nik Đeljošaj, sastao se sa britanskom ambasadorkom u Crnoj Gori, Don Meken, a fokus razgovora bio je na unapređenju ekonomske saradnje, reformskim procesima i jačanju vladavine prava i institucionalne stabilnosti.

  • Ibrahimović razgovarao i sa šefovima diplomatija Jordana, Egipta i Kuvajta
    on 02/03/2026 at 16:52

    Potpredsjednik Vlade Crne Gore i ministar vanjskih poslova Ervin Ibrahimović razgovarao je u odvojenim telefonskim pozivima sa potpredsjednikom Vlade i ministrom vanjskih poslova Jordana Ajmanom Safadijem, ministrom vanjskih poslova Egipta Badrom Abdelatijem, kao i ministrom vanjskih poslova Kuvajta Džarahom Džaber al-Ahmad al-Sabahom. Ranije danas razgovarao je i potpredsjednikom Vlade i ministrom vanjskih poslova Ujedinjeni Arapski Emirati, šeikom Abdulahom bin Zajed Al Nahjanom, kao i sa ministrom vanjskih poslova Oman, Badrom bin Hamadom Al Busaidijem. Tokom razgovora razmotrena je aktuelna bezbjednosna situacija na Bliskom istoku, sa posebnim osvrtom na posljednja dešavanja i njihove moguće posljedice po regionalnu stabilnost.

  • Milatović vratio Zakon o sporazumu sa UAE: Nijedna investicija ne smije da bude iznad zakona
    on 02/03/2026 at 16:49

    Predsjednik Jakov Milatović vratio je na ponovno odlučivanje Zakon o potvrđivanju Sporazuma o saradnji u oblasti energetike između Vlade Crne Gore i Vlade Ujedinjenih Arapskih Emirata. Crna Gora je pouzdan partner, ali prije svega mora biti zemlja vladavine prava, poručio je Milatović.

  • Vuković primio ambasadorku Turske: Fokus na partnerstvo i investicije
    on 02/03/2026 at 15:09

    Prilikom susreta ministra finansija Crne Gore, Novice Vukovića, i novoimenovane ambasadorke, Turske Ajde Unlu, potvrđeni su snažni bilateralni odnosi dvije države, uz najavu produbljivanja ekonomske saradnje, investicija i zajedničkih projekata u privredi, zdravstvu i obrazovanju.

  • Milatović zakazao hitan sastanak zbog situacije na Bliskom istoku
    on 02/03/2026 at 13:42

    Predsjednik Crne Gore Jakov Milatović zakazao je nastavak sjednice Savjeta za odbranu i bezbjednost za 9. mart u 11 sati, a imajući u vidu da predsjednik Vlade Milojko Spajić nije u zemlji ove sedmice.